Graduate Medical Education (GME)
Graduate medical education is the phase of physician training that follows medical school, comprising residency and fellowship programs in which physicians train in a specialty under supervision. In the United States, GME programs are accredited by the ACGME and culminate in eligibility for board certification.
Source: ACGME
The ACGME defines graduate medical education as the period of education in a particular specialty (residency) or subspecialty (fellowship) following medical school. The ACGME is an independent not-for-profit that sets and monitors voluntary professional educational standards, writing requirements through specialty-specific Review Committees and monitoring accredited programs for compliance with them.
Accreditation carries weight because it gates certification. Initial certification by an ABMS member board requires completing an ACGME-accredited residency or training program, or a program whose standards ABMS deems substantially similar, so a program's accreditation status is tied to whether its graduates can sit for their boards. That is the reason program requirements land with more force than most educational guidance.
The assessment machinery inside GME follows from the same requirements. Programs write competency-based goals and objectives, faculty evaluate residents at least at the end of each rotation, a clinical competency committee reviews all evaluations at least semi-annually and determines progress on the specialty-specific Milestones, and the program director reviews that progress with each resident every six months. Residents having difficulty progressing along the Milestones are expected to get intervention documented in an individual remediation plan.
Communication sits awkwardly in this structure. It is a named competency with harmonized milestones attached, and it is also the competency least likely to be directly observed, because the encounters that matter most happen in patient rooms at hours when nobody is scheduled to watch. Programs that want their ICS ratings to mean something have to create the observation rather than wait for it to occur on service, which usually means building scheduled encounters into the curriculum and scoring them the same way every time.
What this looks like in a program
- Communication encounters are scheduled as curriculum rather than left to opportunistic observation, so every learner is assessed on the same scenarios.
- Scored encounters are filed against the specialty-specific Milestones, which means the semi-annual committee review has ICS evidence in the same format as the rest of the competency domains.
- Programs keep a documented trail of practice, assessment, and reassessment, which is what an accreditation review and a contested promotion decision both ask for.
Related terms
Read next
Last updated August 2026