Give every team a clearer way to support better patient conversations
Clinicians, learners, and staff practice with AI patients and get feedback they can use on the next attempt. Patient experience, risk, safety, simulation, and medical education leaders can review patterns against the standards they already hold.
Health systems
The teams responsible for patient experience, safety, risk, and communication standards across the institution.
Risk and patient safety leaders
Communication factors in 40% of asserted malpractice cases
- Practice conversations associated with malpractice claims
- Private participant feedback with access rules set before launch
- Extends the simulation program your institution already runs
Quality and patient experience leaders
Practice the service standards your institution already teaches
- Start with one unit and one communication behavior
- Score your service standards and scripts
- Review named cohorts or anonymous unit results
Medical education
The leaders responsible for curricula, simulation, faculty development, competency review, and remediation.
Program directors
Give each learner a clear next step between coaching sessions
- Structured encounters between coaching sessions
- Rubric-scored reports your CCC can review
- No scheduling, no SP recruitment, no faculty observer required for practice
DIOs and GME leadership
One reporting structure across programs, with local clinical standards
- Shared remediation documentation across every program
- Case-specific frameworks in one program view
- Every session creates a timestamped, rubric-scored record
Simulation center directors
Extend your SP program, don't replace it
- Transcript evidence for faculty and CCC review
- Practice volume for learners who need more support
- A longitudinal record of simulated practice
Clinical competency committees
Rubric-scored evidence for CCC review
- Rubric-scored assessment data from structured practice sessions
- Longitudinal progress tracking across the remediation period
- Structured data to complement faculty observations
Medical school and UME leadership
Sequence communication across all four years
- A four-year arc from history-taking to diagnosis disclosure
- Repeatable practice between standardized patient encounters
- A dashboard that follows each student through clerkships
Faculty and clinician educators
Practice the conversations faculty are expected to model
- Rehearse giving specific corrective feedback
- Lead professionalism conversations with peers
- The same rubric system that trains residents