ClinicalSim

SPIKES Protocol

The SPIKES protocol is a six-step sequence for delivering bad news to patients, published by Walter Baile, Robert Buckman, and colleagues in The Oncologist in 2000. The six steps are Setting up the interview, assessing the patient's Perception, obtaining the patient's Invitation, giving Knowledge and information to the patient, addressing the patient's Emotions with empathic responses, and Strategy and summary. Baile and colleagues built the sequence around four goals for the encounter: gathering information from the patient, transmitting the medical information, providing support to the patient, and eliciting the patient's collaboration in developing a plan for the future.

Source: Baile et al., The Oncologist, 2000

Baile and his co-authors wrote SPIKES for oncologists who deliver unfavorable news thousands of times over a career and who, as the paper notes, mostly learn to do it by watching more experienced colleagues. The paper calls it a protocol rather than a technique because the steps are meant to follow each other in sequence, although the authors are clear that not every episode of breaking bad news requires all six. You will sometimes see it written up as the SPIKES model, but the authors' own word is the more accurate one.

Steps two and three carry most of the weight, and the paper describes them as the place where the clinician applies the axiom "before you tell, ask." The perception step uses open questions such as "What have you been told about your medical situation so far?" so that the clinician learns what the patient already believes before correcting anything, and the invitation step establishes how much detail this particular patient wants. The knowledge step then asks for a warning that bad news is coming, plain vocabulary such as spread instead of metastasized, information given in small chunks with periodic checks on understanding, and no phrase along the lines of there is nothing more we can do.

The empathy step is the one clinicians find hardest, and the paper breaks it into four moves: observe the emotion, name it to yourself, identify the reason behind it, and then make a connecting statement that shows the patient you have linked the two. In the survey the authors ran at an American Society of Clinical Oncology symposium, 52 percent of respondents picked that step as the most difficult element of the protocol, well ahead of every other step. Strategy and summary closes the encounter with a plan the patient has helped shape.

For a program, the value of SPIKES is that it turns one long, dreaded encounter into six observable behaviors, so feedback can name the step a learner skipped instead of calling the whole conversation awkward. That is also why teaching it in a lecture rarely changes bedside behavior: a resident can recite the acronym after twenty minutes and still move straight to the treatment plan the moment a parent starts crying, because the E step is a habit built through repetition rather than a fact to recall.

What this looks like in a program

  • Faculty score an encounter step by step, so a learner who skipped the invitation gets that specific feedback rather than a global impression of the conversation.
  • Mapping SPIKES steps onto an EPA or a milestone gives a competency committee a defensible record of which step a struggling learner actually missed.
  • Repetition matters most at the emotion step, where learners default to reassurance or to the plan as soon as a patient or family member becomes upset.

Last updated August 2026

Put the frameworks into practice

ClinicalSim maps voice-based practice to the competency framework that fits the learner's stage.